Welcome Guest! To enable all features, please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Last Go to last post Unread Go to first unread post
#1 Posted : Wednesday, January 3, 2007 3:32:55 AM(UTC)

cavinm  
cavinm

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2


We are trying to resize from J2k to a smaller 'Thumbnail' JPG version, but when we do, we lose tons of quality. We think its the resize that causes the image to lose quality.

We are using LeadTools ActiveX32Bit 12.1

Here is the code we are currently using.
.Size 80, 100, RESIZE_RESAMPLE
I have examples of J2k Images, vs the .JPG Files after conversion if needed.

Thanks for any help in advance,
Cavin
 

Try the latest version of LEADTOOLS for free for 60 days by downloading the evaluation: https://www.leadtools.com/downloads

Wanna join the discussion? Login to your LEADTOOLS Support accountor Register a new forum account.

#2 Posted : Sunday, January 7, 2007 3:02:57 PM(UTC)

Amin  
Amin

Groups: Manager, Tech Support
Posts: 367

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)

Cavin,
Is the loss in quality visible in the displayed image before you save it, or after you save as JPEG and load it again?
If it's after saving, try to use a smaller value for the Q-Factor parameter in the Save method to improve JPEG quality.
If it's noticeable before saving, please put both J2K and JPEG images in one ZIP file and post them here or send them to support@leadtools.com

Amin Dodin

Senior Support Engineer
LEAD Technologies, Inc.
LEAD Logo
 
#3 Posted : Tuesday, January 9, 2007 2:18:34 AM(UTC)

cavinm  
cavinm

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2


Wow, Thank You!

We never thought about lowering the Q-Factor. Higher number, higher quality... at least thats how our minds were putting it.

Thank you so much!
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.108 seconds.